a response from the Institute of Physics (Publsihers of Environmental Research Letters)
to a UK Times article reporting the suppression of a global warming paper submitted by Dr. Bengtsson. A paper which again attempted to document the less than supportive evidence observed temperatures provide for climate models. The paper was written by a well known climate scientist who chose the unfortunate path of publishing TRUTH rather than Real Climate dogma necessary for success in today’s Climate Science™ field.
The article caught my attention because the reasons given for rejection are wholly unscientific and truly indefensible yet they are expressed as boldly as can be. No really! The author of the reply, Dr. Nicola Gulley, literally used the actual bold himself:
Summarising, the simplistic comparison of ranges from AR4, AR5, and Otto et al, combined with the statement they are inconsistent is less then helpful, actually it…