On June 25, Greg Laden posted an update to his post slamming NY Times journalist/blogger Andrew Revkin for sleeping with the enemy–giving aid and comfort to the enemy–being a Klimate Kwisling, a traitor to the cause. Yeah, Laden’s nuttier than a fruitcake.
Laden had opined that there was zero room for debate on climate science.
His update was a riposte to Revkin’s reply to him. Revkin had written: ““Zero room.” That’s scientific.”
To which Laden replied
“Yes, it is. There is zero room for debate when an issue has been pretty much settled. In science debate can come up anywhere, you never know, but for all practical purposes we do not debate if the Earth is hollow or solid or flat or round, or that germs cause many diseases, or that frogs reproduce as most other tetrapods do rather then spontaneously emerging from mud.” He later continued, “So to repeat…
View original post 164 more words