Instant Karma Strikes Twice

There is something in the eyes of these zealots that’s disconcerting.


Instant Karma is rare – much rarer than strokes, heart attacks, blood clots, neurological disorders, stillbirths, myocarditis, etc. When it strikes twice in a week, live on TV, with the whole world able to tune in, you have to wonder if there is some sort of divine providence at play, you really do. These two incidents look like they’re a set up, but they are actually genuine. First, Heather McDonald, attempting to do ‘comedy’ whilst bragging about being jabbed up to the eyeballs.

She collapses seconds after proclaiming “Jesus loves me the most”. Apparently not.

Now this. A German TV interviewer questioning why mass ‘vaccine’ mandates can’t be introduced sooner.

Look at her eyes. Just wonder to yourself…

View original post 108 more words

They Live : Facebook Fact Checkers are Really Narcissists and Psychopaths

We. See. You.

I often search on Twatter for stories and as I have done for well over a decade now, read the comments. Whilst there are legions of bots, many pushing CCP propaganda, and shills acting like arseholes defecating on everything, occasionally you can learn something or see an interesting link or thread and go down a rabbit hole that may, or may not, bear the fruits of knowledge. Many of the people I interact with were found in such a manner, such as the Climate Contrarian Jaime whom I often post articles from both here and at the WeatherAction newblog. I don’t have to agree with anyone but there are many genuine people online and I value insights and opinions. Occasionally however I find another type altogether. Cluster-B personality disorders.

Continue reading

Watch Gad Saad “Joe Rogan versus Neil Young and Tom Cruise”

American liberals are obsessed with finding ways to silence and censor their adversaries. Every week, if not every day, they have new targets they want de-platformed, banned, silenced, and otherwise prevented from speaking or being heard… For years, their preferred censorship tactic was to expand and distort the concept of “hate speech” to mean “views that make us uncomfortable,” and then demand that such “hateful” views be prohibited on that basis…Their political culture has long inculcated them to believe that they can comfortably silence whatever views they arbitrarily place into this category without being guilty of censorship.

Constitutional illiteracy to the side, the “hate speech” framework for justifying censorship is now insufficient because liberals are eager to silence a much broader range of voices than those they can credibly accuse of being hateful. That is why the newest, and now most popular, censorship framework is to claim that their targets are guilty of spreading “misinformation” or “disinformation.” These terms, by design, have no clear or concise meaning. Like the term “terrorism,” it is their elasticity that makes them so useful.

[…] This “disinformation” term is reserved for those who question liberal pieties, not for those devoted to affirming them. That is the real functional definition of “disinformation” and of its little cousin, “misinformation.” It is not possible to disagree with liberals or see the world differently than they see it. The only two choices are unthinking submission to their dogma or acting as an agent of “disinformation.” Dissent does not exist to them; any deviation from their worldview is inherently dangerous — to the point that it cannot be heard.

[…] Fear always breeds authoritarianism, which is why manipulating and stimulating that human instinct is the favorite tactic of political demagogues.

Glen Greenwald | The Pressure Campaign on Spotify to Remove Joe Rogan Reveals the Religion of Liberals: Censorship